Wikienfk5 - User contributions [en]

Petuelpark

2008-12-15T17:45:15Z

84.57.61.214: /* How can the historical background of an open space be shown to the public? */

'''An artistic and cultural project in Munich, Germany'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Petuelpark''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Munich''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the topic here''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Tuda ''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="48.175244" lon="11.580791" type="satellite" zoom="13" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Short description ===

The Petuelpark is a newly-made park with gardening and artistic elements situated above the Petueltunnel. Both, the park and the tunnel, connect the districts Milbertshofen and Schwabing.

official homepage of Munich:
[http://www.muenchen.de/Tourismus/Sehenswuerdigkeiten/Gaerten_Parks_und_Friedhoefe/petuelpark/161316/index.html]

homepage Jühling und Bertram Landschaftsarchitekten:
[http://www.petuelpark.de/]

additional links:
[http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petuelring]

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===

First of all, the Petuelpark is directly in Munich. So the population density is high in comparison to free space. Because of that fact, it's indispensible to make "new" space - for example above tunnels - accesible for public purposes.
Beyond, in large cities there is often a leak of green space where people can recreate. So it's interesting to see how to handle such problems?

In this case, the concept is made for all generations. Therefore, there are different thematic areas in order to fullfill as much as possible the requirements of a wide ranged person group.

An art concept was developed contemporaneously with the urban landscape design. Now, 13 artworks are intalled all-around the park area.

=== Author's perspective ===
* What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study?

interdisciplinary planning -> more possibilities, open up new vistas, connection of social, economic and design aspects

planning "on different spacial levels" -> creation of "new" open space

planning "in breaches" -> handling of a grown-up city

=== Landscape and/or urban context===

The Petuelpark above the Petueltunnel (longest tunnel in Munich) is located in the North of Munich between the district Schwabing and Milbertshofen. The Petuelring is a part of the "Mittlerer Ring" which is an important main road with about 120.000 vehicles per day.

The park extend from the crossroad Knorrstrasse/Belgradstrasse to the Leopoldstrasse. It's about 650 m length and at least 60 m width.
Close-by, there are underground and tramway stops. Besides, the Olympiapark, the BMW-Museum and -Skyscraper and the "Münchner Freiheit" are some places of interest in the near of the Petuelpark.
In the North of Munich, the park supplement the "green net" composed of Olympiapark, Luitpoldpark and Englischer Garten.

These city part is dense populated and there is a mixture between generations and nationalities.

Historical, at 1963 there was still a tunnel named Petueltunnel, which was an underground crossing of the tramway. This tunnel was put out of service at 1992 and was deconstructed because of the new one.
The name Petuel is related to the family Petuel that renders credit to Munich.

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

completion (Petueltunnel): July 2002

summer 2002: preparatory work (retaining walls, rough subgrade work, substrates)

autumn 2002: subnatural lining Nymphenburg-Biedersteiner-Kanal, start gardening and landscape work (north-side)

2003: gardening and landscape work, trees, plants, bridges, playgrounds, path, planting and lawn areas, furniture

opening: 27.06.2004

2005: Buildings ready (café with restaurant garden, Fontänenplatz, Sozialpavillon with Generationengarten)

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Core questions working group open spaces ===
==== How does the design of an open space contribute to a run down neighbourhood? ====
test, test, test
==== How are open spaces linked to the adjacent areas? ====
(e.g. neighbourhoods, city centre, river)
==== How are open spaces used? ====
(e.g. which groups meet there, which functions does an open space fulfil)

==== Which elements make an open space successful and attractive? ====
==== How can the historical background of an open space be shown to the public? ====

=== Core Questions Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity ===
==== Who was involved in the participation process? ====

There were non-professionals as well as professionals involved in the planning process.

Non-professionals:

-citizens of all ages, especially dweller of the districts Milbertshofen and Schwabing
-children
-people with disabilities, especially paralised, visually impaired and blind persons, from the institution "Stiftung
Pfennigparade", that is close to the Petuelpark

and professionals:

-Baureferat und Planungsreferat München, which are responsible for all manners concerning the planning and construction
process
-Ingenieurbüro Dr. Blasy + Mader, which is an engineering company
-Landschaftsarchitekurbüro Jühling + Bertram, which is a company for landscape architecture
-13 international artists under the leadership of Stefan Huber

took part in the participation process.

==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====

For working with non-professionals, different kinds of workshops were organised:

A civil workshop called 'Workshop Petuelpark' in which citizens, responsibles of official entities. the artist Stefan Huber and companies for engineering and landscape architecture took an active part in. There, some ideas were evolved and suggestions made by the citizens were discussed.

An other ohter workshop named 'Workshop Wasserspielplatz' was concerning the childrens who did handicrafts in order to visualise their ideas of a water playground.

Besides these workshops, people with disabilities from the centre 'Stiftung Pfennigparade' were involved in the planning process in order to make the park not only handicapped accessible, but also to look to this people for advice.

As well as participatory interactions between professionals and laypersons, there was also interdisciplinary planning and cooperation within a occupational group:

Thirteen international artists worked together under the concept Quivid - it's a Munich programm for art elements in the urban context so called 'Kunst am Bau'. At first, there was a competition with the requirement of teaming up with other artists. The winner was Stefan Huber who acted as artist group leader. The individual works of art should be part of an overall concept.

The interdisciplinary participation concerns different types of private and public companies - for example in order to build the tunnel itself, to construct the brigdes, to make the gardening element, to create the high quality buildings and so on.

==== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? ====

First and foremost, the project respnd to the people's need for green space and recreation in a high density city.

The concept of the park tries to deal with the requirement of people of all ages as well as different social and national background as well as unequal physical abilities.
In order to fullfill these demands, the park combines many kinds of individual parcel with a overall structure and style accentuated with some modern art.

And the most important fact is that the park has its own modern style with extraordinary details that creates some kind of individuality and recognition. So people could identify with the Petualpark and bear personal relation that satisfies the need of singularity and familarity.

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category:Parks]]
[[Category:Urban Design]]
[[Category:Public space and Civic identity]]
[[Category:Civic identity]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Munich]]
[[Category:Working Group Open Spaces]]
[[Category:Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity]]

About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Petuelpark

2008-12-15T17:42:42Z

84.57.61.214: /* How are open spaces used? */

'''An artistic and cultural project in Munich, Germany'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Petuelpark''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Munich''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the topic here''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Tuda ''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="48.175244" lon="11.580791" type="satellite" zoom="13" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Short description ===

The Petuelpark is a newly-made park with gardening and artistic elements situated above the Petueltunnel. Both, the park and the tunnel, connect the districts Milbertshofen and Schwabing.

official homepage of Munich:
[http://www.muenchen.de/Tourismus/Sehenswuerdigkeiten/Gaerten_Parks_und_Friedhoefe/petuelpark/161316/index.html]

homepage Jühling und Bertram Landschaftsarchitekten:
[http://www.petuelpark.de/]

additional links:
[http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petuelring]

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===

First of all, the Petuelpark is directly in Munich. So the population density is high in comparison to free space. Because of that fact, it's indispensible to make "new" space - for example above tunnels - accesible for public purposes.
Beyond, in large cities there is often a leak of green space where people can recreate. So it's interesting to see how to handle such problems?

In this case, the concept is made for all generations. Therefore, there are different thematic areas in order to fullfill as much as possible the requirements of a wide ranged person group.

An art concept was developed contemporaneously with the urban landscape design. Now, 13 artworks are intalled all-around the park area.

=== Author's perspective ===
* What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study?

interdisciplinary planning -> more possibilities, open up new vistas, connection of social, economic and design aspects

planning "on different spacial levels" -> creation of "new" open space

planning "in breaches" -> handling of a grown-up city

=== Landscape and/or urban context===

The Petuelpark above the Petueltunnel (longest tunnel in Munich) is located in the North of Munich between the district Schwabing and Milbertshofen. The Petuelring is a part of the "Mittlerer Ring" which is an important main road with about 120.000 vehicles per day.

The park extend from the crossroad Knorrstrasse/Belgradstrasse to the Leopoldstrasse. It's about 650 m length and at least 60 m width.
Close-by, there are underground and tramway stops. Besides, the Olympiapark, the BMW-Museum and -Skyscraper and the "Münchner Freiheit" are some places of interest in the near of the Petuelpark.
In the North of Munich, the park supplement the "green net" composed of Olympiapark, Luitpoldpark and Englischer Garten.

These city part is dense populated and there is a mixture between generations and nationalities.

Historical, at 1963 there was still a tunnel named Petueltunnel, which was an underground crossing of the tramway. This tunnel was put out of service at 1992 and was deconstructed because of the new one.
The name Petuel is related to the family Petuel that renders credit to Munich.

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

completion (Petueltunnel): July 2002

summer 2002: preparatory work (retaining walls, rough subgrade work, substrates)

autumn 2002: subnatural lining Nymphenburg-Biedersteiner-Kanal, start gardening and landscape work (north-side)

2003: gardening and landscape work, trees, plants, bridges, playgrounds, path, planting and lawn areas, furniture

opening: 27.06.2004

2005: Buildings ready (café with restaurant garden, Fontänenplatz, Sozialpavillon with Generationengarten)

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Core questions working group open spaces ===
==== How does the design of an open space contribute to a run down neighbourhood? ====
test, test, test
==== How are open spaces linked to the adjacent areas? ====
(e.g. neighbourhoods, city centre, river)
==== How are open spaces used? ====
(e.g. which groups meet there, which functions does an open space fulfil)

==== Which elements make an open space successful and attractive? ====
==== How can the historical background of an open space be shown to the public? ====

In this case study the historical background is that the existing park was built above a contemporanously constructed tunnel which is part of a traditional main traffic connection in Munich. To underline this fact the visitors could look down via a scuttle and watch the traffic.

=== Core Questions Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity ===
==== Who was involved in the participation process? ====

There were non-professionals as well as professionals involved in the planning process.

Non-professionals:

-citizens of all ages, especially dweller of the districts Milbertshofen and Schwabing
-children
-people with disabilities, especially paralised, visually impaired and blind persons, from the institution "Stiftung
Pfennigparade", that is close to the Petuelpark

and professionals:

-Baureferat und Planungsreferat München, which are responsible for all manners concerning the planning and construction
process
-Ingenieurbüro Dr. Blasy + Mader, which is an engineering company
-Landschaftsarchitekurbüro Jühling + Bertram, which is a company for landscape architecture
-13 international artists under the leadership of Stefan Huber

took part in the participation process.

==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====

For working with non-professionals, different kinds of workshops were organised:

A civil workshop called 'Workshop Petuelpark' in which citizens, responsibles of official entities. the artist Stefan Huber and companies for engineering and landscape architecture took an active part in. There, some ideas were evolved and suggestions made by the citizens were discussed.

An other ohter workshop named 'Workshop Wasserspielplatz' was concerning the childrens who did handicrafts in order to visualise their ideas of a water playground.

Besides these workshops, people with disabilities from the centre 'Stiftung Pfennigparade' were involved in the planning process in order to make the park not only handicapped accessible, but also to look to this people for advice.

As well as participatory interactions between professionals and laypersons, there was also interdisciplinary planning and cooperation within a occupational group:

Thirteen international artists worked together under the concept Quivid - it's a Munich programm for art elements in the urban context so called 'Kunst am Bau'. At first, there was a competition with the requirement of teaming up with other artists. The winner was Stefan Huber who acted as artist group leader. The individual works of art should be part of an overall concept.

The interdisciplinary participation concerns different types of private and public companies - for example in order to build the tunnel itself, to construct the brigdes, to make the gardening element, to create the high quality buildings and so on.

==== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? ====

First and foremost, the project respnd to the people's need for green space and recreation in a high density city.

The concept of the park tries to deal with the requirement of people of all ages as well as different social and national background as well as unequal physical abilities.
In order to fullfill these demands, the park combines many kinds of individual parcel with a overall structure and style accentuated with some modern art.

And the most important fact is that the park has its own modern style with extraordinary details that creates some kind of individuality and recognition. So people could identify with the Petualpark and bear personal relation that satisfies the need of singularity and familarity.

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category:Parks]]
[[Category:Urban Design]]
[[Category:Public space and Civic identity]]
[[Category:Civic identity]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Munich]]
[[Category:Working Group Open Spaces]]
[[Category:Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity]]

About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories

Petuelpark

2008-12-15T17:27:50Z

84.57.61.214: /* How can the historical background of an open space be shown to the public? */

'''An artistic and cultural project in Munich, Germany'''
{| align="right" width="300pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Petuelpark''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Munich''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topic''' || style="background:Lavender"|''please enter the topic here''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Martina Tuda ''
|-
| '''Completion''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the date of completion''
|-
| '''Client''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the client''
|-
| '''Project costs''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Please enter the costs (if known)''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[Image:projectimage.jpg|300px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| <googlemap version="0.9" lat="48.175244" lon="11.580791" type="satellite" zoom="13" width="300" height="250">
</googlemap>
|}

=== Short description ===

The Petuelpark is a newly-made park with gardening and artistic elements situated above the Petueltunnel. Both, the park and the tunnel, connect the districts Milbertshofen and Schwabing.

official homepage of Munich:
[http://www.muenchen.de/Tourismus/Sehenswuerdigkeiten/Gaerten_Parks_und_Friedhoefe/petuelpark/161316/index.html]

homepage Jühling und Bertram Landschaftsarchitekten:
[http://www.petuelpark.de/]

additional links:
[http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petuelring]

=== Rationale: Why is this case study interesting? ===

First of all, the Petuelpark is directly in Munich. So the population density is high in comparison to free space. Because of that fact, it's indispensible to make "new" space - for example above tunnels - accesible for public purposes.
Beyond, in large cities there is often a leak of green space where people can recreate. So it's interesting to see how to handle such problems?

In this case, the concept is made for all generations. Therefore, there are different thematic areas in order to fullfill as much as possible the requirements of a wide ranged person group.

An art concept was developed contemporaneously with the urban landscape design. Now, 13 artworks are intalled all-around the park area.

=== Author's perspective ===
* What theoretical or professional perspective do you bring to the case study?

interdisciplinary planning -> more possibilities, open up new vistas, connection of social, economic and design aspects

planning "on different spacial levels" -> creation of "new" open space

planning "in breaches" -> handling of a grown-up city

=== Landscape and/or urban context===

The Petuelpark above the Petueltunnel (longest tunnel in Munich) is located in the North of Munich between the district Schwabing and Milbertshofen. The Petuelring is a part of the "Mittlerer Ring" which is an important main road with about 120.000 vehicles per day.

The park extend from the crossroad Knorrstrasse/Belgradstrasse to the Leopoldstrasse. It's about 650 m length and at least 60 m width.
Close-by, there are underground and tramway stops. Besides, the Olympiapark, the BMW-Museum and -Skyscraper and the "Münchner Freiheit" are some places of interest in the near of the Petuelpark.
In the North of Munich, the park supplement the "green net" composed of Olympiapark, Luitpoldpark and Englischer Garten.

These city part is dense populated and there is a mixture between generations and nationalities.

Historical, at 1963 there was still a tunnel named Petueltunnel, which was an underground crossing of the tramway. This tunnel was put out of service at 1992 and was deconstructed because of the new one.
The name Petuel is related to the family Petuel that renders credit to Munich.

=== Cultural/social/political context===
*Brief explanation of culture, political economy, legal framework

Illustration:
Bullet points, image, background notes

=== History ===
*How did the area/project/plan at the focus of the case study evolve?

Illustration: Table or time line

completion (Petueltunnel): July 2002

summer 2002: preparatory work (retaining walls, rough subgrade work, substrates)

autumn 2002: subnatural lining Nymphenburg-Biedersteiner-Kanal, start gardening and landscape work (north-side)

2003: gardening and landscape work, trees, plants, bridges, playgrounds, path, planting and lawn areas, furniture

opening: 27.06.2004

2005: Buildings ready (café with restaurant garden, Fontänenplatz, Sozialpavillon with Generationengarten)

=== Spatial analysis of area/project/plan===
*What are the main structural features?
*How has it been shaped? Were there any critical decisions?

Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Core questions working group open spaces ===
==== How does the design of an open space contribute to a run down neighbourhood? ====
test, test, test
==== How are open spaces linked to the adjacent areas? ====
(e.g. neighbourhoods, city centre, river)
==== How are open spaces used? ====
(e.g. which groups meet there, which functions does an open space fulfil)
==== Which elements make an open space successful and attractive? ====
==== How can the historical background of an open space be shown to the public? ====

In this case study the historical background is that the existing park was built above a contemporanously constructed tunnel which is part of a traditional main traffic connection in Munich. To underline this fact the visitors could look down via a scuttle and watch the traffic.

=== Core Questions Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity ===
==== Who was involved in the participation process? ====

There were non-professionals as well as professionals involved in the planning process.

Non-professionals:

-citizens of all ages, especially dweller of the districts Milbertshofen and Schwabing
-children
-people with disabilities, especially paralised, visually impaired and blind persons, from the institution "Stiftung
Pfennigparade", that is close to the Petuelpark

and professionals:

-Baureferat und Planungsreferat München, which are responsible for all manners concerning the planning and construction
process
-Ingenieurbüro Dr. Blasy + Mader, which is an engineering company
-Landschaftsarchitekurbüro Jühling + Bertram, which is a company for landscape architecture
-13 international artists under the leadership of Stefan Huber

took part in the participation process.

==== How was the participation process implemented (methods applied)? ====

For working with non-professionals, different kinds of workshops were organised:

A civil workshop called 'Workshop Petuelpark' in which citizens, responsibles of official entities. the artist Stefan Huber and companies for engineering and landscape architecture took an active part in. There, some ideas were evolved and suggestions made by the citizens were discussed.

An other ohter workshop named 'Workshop Wasserspielplatz' was concerning the childrens who did handicrafts in order to visualise their ideas of a water playground.

Besides these workshops, people with disabilities from the centre 'Stiftung Pfennigparade' were involved in the planning process in order to make the park not only handicapped accessible, but also to look to this people for advice.

As well as participatory interactions between professionals and laypersons, there was also interdisciplinary planning and cooperation within a occupational group:

Thirteen international artists worked together under the concept Quivid - it's a Munich programm for art elements in the urban context so called 'Kunst am Bau'. At first, there was a competition with the requirement of teaming up with other artists. The winner was Stefan Huber who acted as artist group leader. The individual works of art should be part of an overall concept.

The interdisciplinary participation concerns different types of private and public companies - for example in order to build the tunnel itself, to construct the brigdes, to make the gardening element, to create the high quality buildings and so on.

==== In how far does/did the project respond to people's needs? ====

First and foremost, the project respnd to the people's need for green space and recreation in a high density city.

The concept of the park tries to deal with the requirement of people of all ages as well as different social and national background as well as unequal physical abilities.
In order to fullfill these demands, the park combines many kinds of individual parcel with a overall structure and style accentuated with some modern art.

And the most important fact is that the park has its own modern style with extraordinary details that creates some kind of individuality and recognition. So people could identify with the Petualpark and bear personal relation that satisfies the need of singularity and familarity.

=== Analysis of program/function ===
* What are the main functional characteristics?
* How have they been expressed or incorporated?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of design/planning process ===
* How was the area/project/plan formulated and implemented?
*Were there any important consultations/collaborations?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Analysis of use/users ===
* How is the area/project/plan used and by whom?
* Is the use changing? Are there any issues?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Future development directions ===
* How is the area/project/plan evolving?
* Are there any future goals?
Illustration: Map/diagram/sketches photos and background notes

=== Peer reviews or critique ===
* Has the area/ project/plan been reviewed by academic or professional reviewers?
* What were their main evaluations?
Pleas add references, quotes...

=== Points of success and limitations ===
*What do you see as the main points of success and limitations of the area/project/plan?
Illustration: Summary table

=== What can be generalized from this case study? ===
*Are there any important theoretical insights?
Short statement plus background notes

=== Which research questions does it generate? ===
Short statement plus background notes

=== Image Gallery ===

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
Image:yourimage.jpg|your image text
</gallery>

=== References ===
Please add literature, documentations and weblinks

----
[[Category:Case Study]]
[[Category:Parks]]
[[Category:Urban Design]]
[[Category:Public space and Civic identity]]
[[Category:Civic identity]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Munich]]
[[Category:Working Group Open Spaces]]
[[Category:Working Group Public Space and Civic Identity]]

About categories: You can add more categories by copying the tag and filling in your additional categories